A PROJECT focused on
innovation in teaching and learning in VET is being conducted from
late 2002 to April 2003 with funding from the Australian National
Training Authority and managed by the Victorian Office of Training
and Tertiary Education.
One of the first products from the
project is a discussion paper on innovation in teaching, learning
and assessment, prepared by the project consultants above, led by
John Mitchell from John Mitchell & Associates. A synopsis of
the paper follows.
The discussion paper takes the position
that the point of promoting innovation in teaching and learning
is to achieve better student outcomes. We take the view that what
teachers do is critical to VET's impact, and that good process and
outcomes that result from good teacher judgement is the central
defining feature of the effective professional VET provider. We
strongly believe that teaching and teachers remain one critical
bridge between a client's present and future success. For us, education
and educational values are in no way diminished by acknowledging
VET's central tasks - which we think is about helping people to
realise their potential, extending peoples' capacity to pursue and
realise knowledge, and partnering people into the future with appropriate
and meaningful support. These tasks are personal and professional
roles that give meaning to, as well as take energy from, the professional
teacher and trainer.
This project also focuses on innovation
in assessment. Effective assessment by teachers and trainers is
an integral part of the knowledge and learning cycle that guides
the behaviour and practice of VET professionals. Effective assessment
also guides people in their knowledge of themselves and their capacities
and capabilities, as well as providing feedback on their personal
progress and performance. In addition to these intrinsic qualities,
learner assessment also provides the means of awarding formal recognition
and accreditation.
Given this interlocking range of functions,
learner assessment is a critical part of teaching and learning.
Its role, always central to good pedagogy, has been accentuated
by national training reform in the VET system and assessment is
firmly located within teacher effectiveness and teacher value. Improvement
in assessment in VET is based around innovative ways of collecting
evidence and making good judgements while maintaining consistency
and achieving quality. (Clayton et al, 2001).
We are all facing increasing personal,
professional and organisational challenges. For example, Burns (2002,
p22) suggests that we are moving into a world that is complex and
unpredictable; network-based and horizontally integrated; information
rich; and, uncomfortably, largely beyond our personal control. For
work organisations and work-focused societies, one response is to
assist people to capitalise on their learning capabilities in order
to learn more rapidly and to apply that learning in knowledgeable
ways:
The new economic paradigm requires
flexibility, quality, innovation and knowledge at all levels. Success
now depends on how quickly and well employees can transform ideas
into better products and services. In the new economy, employees
capable of rapid learning and willing to undertake retraining in
complex tasks/skills are critical. (Burns, 2002, p22)
The drivers of innovation in teaching
and learning in VET are numerous and are not limited to economic
or business imperatives and they include:
- rising complexity and uncertainty in society
- the changing structures of work
- the changing structures of industry and employment
- the growing economic value of knowledge and skills
- public policy changes about the role of education and training
- new technology
- shrinking time-to-market
- the change from mass production to catering for market segmentation
and customised or personal learning that meets learner requirements
As a result of these kinds of drivers,
much of what has been taken for granted in the recent past is being
contested; and this has important psychological implications for
people and society, including the cultures of the VET workforces.
As a consequence, wider, deeper and
more frequent innovation is now appropriate in VET teaching and
learning practices. In particular, the sharper focus is on supporting
teachers and trainers to encourage more focused outcomes and performance
for learners, based on:
- ensuring relevance
- ensuring personal service
- providing "just for me" training
- supporting "learning in context"
Innovation in learning is needed by
VET students, so the students can quickly and effectively acquire
skills to meet the pace of change. For example, in industry there
is the need for the following:
- continuous skilling to meet new and emerging industry needs
- re-skilling of some staff following the disappearance of many
entry-level jobs
- re-skilling of older employees
- recognising the current skills of the existing workforce and
reskilling them if necessary
- developing competencies in new domains such as in e-business
- expanding personal and interpersonal skills and knowledge work
Innovation in learning is also needed
by VET students so they can better cope with the changes to the
world of work, including the increase in self-employed workers;
the growing casualisation of the Australian workforce; and the emergence
of "portfolio" workers holding a cluster of part-time
positions. Innovation is also required to stimulate learner creativity,
motivation and improved learner performance in personal and social
settings, as well as in industrial and occupational arenas.
Innovation is very much about application
and practice and is distinguishable from invention, viz
Invention is imagining a good idea
or concept and turning this concept into a reality. Innovation is
turning an invention into a product or service that is successful
in the market because it fulfils a need or desire of the market
(Ellyard, 2001, p158).
This perspective places the emphasis
on innovation providing value for people and society.
VET learners need teachers and trainers
constantly looking for ways of adding value to the learning experience
and its outcomes. This is an ongoing professional challenge that
requires both recognition and continued improvements in professional
practice. The challenges are even more evident when it is acknowledged
that the modern VET learners can be located in a profit or not-for-profit
organisation, be self-employed, unemployed or not yet in the labour
market.
This emphasis on the teacher providing
value fits the view offered by Rossett & Sheldon (2001) of the
expanding roles of the training professional. On the one hand, they
see the conventional roles of the training professional as designer,
developer, deliverer, demonstrator and coordinator. But, increasingly
they allow for the roles of the teacher to include those of learning
manager, knowledge systems' expert, learning broker and learning
strategist. These newer roles continue the focus on achieving learner
and organisational outcomes as well as providing more stimulating
work and career paths for the teachers and trainers engaged in these
roles.
Applying this to the VET context in
Australia, we anticipate that teachers and trainers are likely to
address innovation across four broad areas of practice, viz.
- vocational skills: such as a knowledge of tourism or engineering
- adult learning/teaching skills: such as how to support learner
autonomy
- vet sector specific skills: such as how to assess competencies
in the workplace
- generic personal skills: such as developmental skills, including
managing personal and professional growth
- Each segment has three domains: techniques for effective application;
content knowledge; and context- experience and understanding of
the learner and also of themselves as teachers.
A VET teacher or trainer can be innovative
by drawing on her/his skills in one or more of the above areas of
practice.
The competency based movement was,
and remains, only one response to a much broader process of learning
reform that is still unfolding. This shift is demanding that learning
be recognised and encouraged and supported much more broadly - firstly
to meet the needs of industry and, more recently, to support the
concept of recurrent or lifelong learning for the active citizen.
As the role of learning has begun
to change, so too has the identity of appropriate pedagogy. By the
mid-1990s commentators were noticing the need for wider recognition
of learning processes and clearer relationships with learning outcomes.
For example, one view (Tinkler, Lepani & Mitchell 1995) was
that at least eight different types of learning would be needed
in order to satisfy demand, as follows:
- Lifelong learning
- Learner-directed learning
- Learning to learn
- Contextualised learning
- Customised learning
- Transformative learning
- Collaborative/cooperative learning
- Just-in-time learning. ( p79)
Many of these have now been adopted
as single or multi-strand learning strategies in VET. For example,
Burns (2002, pp.260-305) notes VET's innovative use of:
- workbased and workplace learning
- activity-based and problem-based learning
- guided experiential learning
- simulations and games
- mentoring and coaching
- informal learning such as peer tutoring and virtual communities
- flexible learning, e-learning, online learning and now blended
learning
- learning organisations, learning communities and communities
of practice
Burns believes that the current movement
in learning in VET is toward "flexible, interactive, self-directed
and self-paced learning" (p305). The trend is towards the development
of lifelong learning, and is:
"based on flexible delivery and
permitting adults to enhance their sense of identity, self-determination,
autonomy, mastery and self-worth". (p305)
While the general case for adult learners
wanting change is quite well known, what is less emphasised is that
some learners will not take easily to the degree of responsibility
implicit in the more ambitious self-directed, collaborative learning
models. It is all well and good to present how idealised learners
behave. But, in the real world we can expect reluctance, resistance,
or lack of interest from many learners. This is due to a wide variety
of factors - including a lack of skills or confidence to learn,
or lack of obvious motivators to acquire such learning capabilities
- that conspire to hold back learners back. Such cultural, attitudinal,
situational and societal factors are powerful barriers to any sense
of orderly progress in learner needs and behaviours. "Youth
at risk" groups are but one example of this cautionary tale.
The abridged discussion paper provided
is simply a starting point for conversations and dialogue with VET
practitioners about recognising and celebrating good examples of
innovative pedagogy.
Readers are invited to email feedback
on any issues or questions raised by the discussion paper to the
principal consultant, John Mitchell johnm@jma.com.au by November
30, 2002.
Two discussion papers have been prepared
for this project. The first, on trends in innovation, was discussed
above. The second discussion paper examines possible mechanisms
for promoting and sustaining innovation in VET. Both papers are
available at www.jma.com.au/innovation, together with companion
literature reviews.
* John Mitchell, Managing Director,
John Mitchell & Associates, is a leading Australian VET researcher,
author and consultant in professional development, strategic Planning
and change management. Berwyn Clayton is director of the Centre
Undertaking Research in Vocational
Education (CURVE), Canberra Institute of Technology and president
of AVETRA. John Hedberg is professor of education at the University
of Wollongong. Nigel Paine is head of training and knowledge management
at the BBC in London.
Burns, R. (2002), The Adult Learner
at Work, Business and Professional Publishing Pty Ltd, Warriewood,
NSW
Clayton, B., Booth, R. & Roy,
S. (2001) 'Maximising confidence in assessment decision-making:
A springboard to quality in assessment' , paper presented at 4th
AVETRA conference, Research to reality: Putting research to work,
AVETRA, Alexandria, NSW
Ellyard, P. 'Imagining the future
and getting to it first', in Australian Institute of Management
(2001), Innovation and Imagination at Work, McGraw Hill, Sydney
Rossett, A & Sheldon, K. (2001),
Beyond the Podium, Delivering Training and Performance to a Digital
World, Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer, San Francisco
Tinkler, D., Lepani, B., & Mitchell,
J. (1996), 'Education and Technology Convergence: A Survey of Technological
Infrastructure in Education and the Professional Development and
Support of Educators and Trainers' in Information and Communication
Technologies, commissioned report No. 43, NBEET, AGPS, Canberra
|